TOP

Eliminating Clicksor Ads

If you’ve visited the site in the last couple of weeks, you probably noticed some flash-based ads at the bottom of the screen.  They’d be banners that would appear for a few seconds and then offer a “Close” link at the top-right.  These ads would sometimes take the form of square and vertical banner ads, too.  Rarely, even a video would play.  These ads were from a company called Clicksor.  On the advice of a friend who was also experimenting with Clicksor, I added Clicksor to my Google Adsense ads.  Although it was slightly against my better judgement to display upwards of four ads on a page, I went along with it.

This morning, I decided to eliminate the Clicksor ads.  My fellow blogger and I began to research Clicksor a bit more the past few days and decided we didn’t like their business practices.  They hide information about their pay-out methods (and how they can evade paying web-publishers) and their method of screening advertisers deserves scrutiny, too.  We’ve had sporadic e-mails from readers claiming the Clicksor ads were offering pornography and some even triggered red-alerts from Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox over trojan-horses and other forms of malware.  I’ve also noticed advertisements for online gambling, an activity that is illegal in the State of Indiana.

Although my traffic has remained fairly steady, my friend believes his has dropped about 10% over the last month due to the pesky nature and content of Clicksor’s pop-over flash ads.

I sincerely apologize if this has caused any problems for my readers.  The malware warnings were incredibly rare, and likely were only triggered because the ad was hosted on a website known to contain dangerous elements.  Likewise, only one of my readers reported seeing a pornographic ad and I only saw an online gambling ad once on this site.  I also run a website that discusses political and social issues.  My counterpart’s blog focuses on celebrity gossip, so there were several more problems regarding the latter problems on his site.

For what it’s worth, Clicksor asks if you have adult content on your website AND whether or not you want adult content to be featured in ads that appear on your website.  I answered “No” to both questions.  This plus the simple fact that they aren’t screening advertisers for end-user safety led me to say their screening method deserves scrutiny.

In the meantime, i will continue to run Google ads; which have been proven safe; on this site and satellite websites in the KTracy.com network.

Read More
TOP

Babyz: What if video games were more realistic?

Video game graphics have improved dramatically over the past 20 years. As a result, gameplay is more realistic than ever. In fact, E3 is going on this week, and the world is getting to see what the future of gaming has in store for us. But what if we take gaming to the NEXT level?

I offer a sample idea. My girlfriend and I were browsing at Target this afternoon and we stumbled across this on the shelves for the Nintendo DS:

Of course, the first thing that comes to mind is that the game, which is marketed to teen and pre-teen girls, is encouraging these kids to want “babyz” of their own. I have absolutely no desire to play the game, and even if I did, I don’t own a DS. However, I think we can safely assume that the game focuses heavily on the pleasures of having a baby and makes light of the more demanding things; such as the long nights and Satanic smells that radiate from the fluids coming from that infant’s orifices.

So what if video games were more realistic? Wouldn’t it be awesome if some annoying kid put this cartridge into their DS, and the next thing they know is that they are being bombarded by a crying infant who won’t stop throwing up? Or perhaps a fever that causes the DS processors to run at full speed, causing the device to heat up? Sure, that’s close to real, but it’s not there yet.

The game should also install software on your DS so that when this annoying kid wants to play her puppy game, she is constantly interrupted by crying noises from the infant that’s being neglected. What’s wrong? Oh, look at that poo-filled diaper! How CUTE!!! (sarcasm intended) It will get even CUTER when you’re being interrupted every 5-15 minutes because the baby is cold, hot, wet, sick, soiled, taking off its clothes, hungry, or eating coffee grounds straight from the can.

At this point, the girl playing the game might want to uninstall it from her DS. But she can’t uninstall it. At least not for 18 years. She should have thought twice before putting that DS cartridge into her cartridge slot.

She’ll either have to deal with the consequences of her actions or give her DS up to someone who really wants one but, for one reason or another, can’t get one on their own.

As Krista suggested in Target, the number of “Dumpster DS Babies” would probably skyrocket.

Who knows, if games were more realistic, maybe kids might actually learn something useful about life from them.

Read More
TOP

Japanese Commercial: Curiosity Killed The Cat

Does ANYBODY know what this was part of an advertisement for?  It worked and I want to try whatever it is.  Only, I don’t even know where to begin.

Any help at all will be greatly appreciated!  If you send me in the right direction, I’ll give you a free copy of the MSPaint Comic: Volume I when it’s done.

I’ll review the product here on the site, too!

Read More
TOP

DFA Wireless – Calling for Change

One of my liberal newsletters, called “Democracy for America” (formerly Dean for America), sent an interesting and frankly baffling e-mail offer to me.

DFA Wireless – a cell phone service provider that is “Calling for Change.”

* Easy switching: Working Assets will buy out your current contract, up to $175
* Get a free LG camera phone – a $169 value
* Keep your current phone number
* Unlimited night and weekend minutes
* 30 minutes of Free Speech calls each month³
* Competitively priced plans starting at $29.99 a month

I haven’t looked into their text and picture message rates, but their calling plans appear to be very competitive. You’d think they understood something about capitalism.

Now granted, I’m not sure what the primary motivation behind this move is. It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense no matter how you look at it. The only thing similar to this that I can think of would be how terrorist groups and their affiliated political parties provide infrastructure to their supporters. Terrorists will usually build roads and schools, but we don’t need those here in the United States. So what do we need that political parties can actually provide? How about an affordable cell phone plan?

And in all honesty, I’ve always thought that members of the Republican Party should be building and spending time at the Boys and Girls Clubs, YMCAs, Girl and Boy Scouts organizations, homeless shelters, beaten wives shelters, and other places. Not only is it a good PR move for the party, but it keeps us in touch with America and problems faced by our fellow citizens. Changing the focus of the party from winning cash to winning hearts and minds would be a difficult process, but the Democrats seem to be at least showing interest in the idea. While I still question the cell phone deal, they are putting people in an interesting situation where their political party controls one of their daily necessities.

On a much wider scale, the Bolsheviks did this in Russia after the October Revolution and you’re seeing the Chavistas do this in Venezuela as well. The concept really is time-tested, proven, and incredibly effective. But DFA Wireless? Is that really the most effective first step? Targeting a younger generation I guess… does anyone out there actually like their wireless provider?

Read More