Islamic Cultural Center “at” Ground Zero « Kevin Tracy

Islamic Cultural Center “at” Ground Zero

Posted By Kevin Tracy at 5:13 am on December 22, 2009

The location of 45 Park Place, the future location of a major Islamic Cultural Center

Evangelical Christians and others are up in arms about an Islamic Mosque and Cultural Center near the site of the World Trade Center turning into a major Islamic cultural center. By the way they were complaining about this, one would think they invaded Ground Zero and begun building a giant mosque directly on the site. Unfortunately, I’d be willing to bet that the fear mongers responsible for blowing this story out of proportion intend for just that to happen.

In fact, the location is two city blocks away at 45 Park Place.

As terrible as this sounds, the location of this site is a former Burlington Coat Factory that was destroyed by debris from the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Since the time Burlington Coat Factory left the building, gangs took over and vandalized the property; making it an utter eyesore. That’s when Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, a professor for St. Joseph’s College (he must be a radical Muslim if he’s willing to teach at a private Christian school), purchased the property as an “overflow” place for worshipers to come and pray. Now, they’re planning on developing the property and building the proposed Cultural Center. Rauf has been an active voice in trying to improve Islamic-Western relations for the past 25 years and to think that anything he’s planning on doing is going to be used by extremists is simply absurd.

And quite frankly, I say it’s wonderful! Instead of being a haven for crime, they’re turning it into something that will educate people about the true nature of Islam and how what happened a couple blocks away was not representative of the Islam worshiped by the vast majority of the world’s 1 billion Muslims. I have no doubt that when they’re finished, it’s going to be a beautiful addition to the neighborhood that desperately needs a face lift after what happened over eight years ago.

What particularly irritates me about this is the absolute ignorance of the Evangelical media. For example, let’s look at World Net Daily.

Now Muslim worshippers currently occupy the building, and they plan to turn it into a major Islamic cultural center.

“The men and women stand up, raise their hands on either side of their head, murmur ‘Allahu akhbar,’ bow and kneel again,” reports Spiegel Online.

He said the West must understand the terrorists’ point of view – and he blamed Christians for starting mass attacks on civilians.

“The Islamic method of waging war is not to kill innocent civilians. But it was Christians in World War II who bombed civilians in Dresden and Hiroshima, neither of which were military targets,” he said.

Really quickly, this last quote was taken completely out of context. He was briefing FBI agents for a sensitivity training course, so it was absolutely imperative to how they do their job that they understand the terrorists’ point of view. If they walked out of there not understanding that, Rauf didn’t do his job.

According to the report, Rauf said there would be little progress until the U.S. acknowledged backing dictators and the U.S. president gave an “America Culpa” speech to the Muslim world.

This is true, actually. We give a tremendous amount of money to keep the Islamic dictatorships in power across the Middle East. Israel actually gets really ticked off about it every couple of years and the political and social oppression is often times what motivates people to resort to violence under the only flag that offers them freedom – religious fanaticism.

In an interview with Beliefnet on Islam and America, a reporter asked Rauf, “Some Islamic charities are being investigated for terrorist ties. Have you seen what you consider to be reputable Islamic charities being financially damaged?”

“We believe that a certain portion of every charity has been legitimate,” he responded. “To say that you have connections with terrorism is a very gray area. It’s like the accusation that Saddam Hussein had links to Osama bin Laden. Well, America had links to Osama bin Laden – does that mean that America is a terrorist country or has ties to terrorism?”

Again, he’s actually right. Part of the reason for this is that most terrorist groups are allowed to stay where they are because they give back to the community. Islam actually mandates that they do, so you can look at a terrorist group like Hizbollah in Lebanon and find a charity that supports them pretty easily. But what if the money raised by the charity and given to Hizbollah goes to building roads and buying medicine?

Do they have to deal with Hizbollah? Well, if you want to help people in the most poverty stricken parts of Lebanon, you have to deal with whoever has guns pointed at you when you arrive. And in all honesty, Hizbollah probably knows where the charity money needs to go better than anybody because of how active they are in the community.

With that said, it might be safer to help starving children in South America. Rauf is right though.

In 2004, Rauf participated in a 30-second advertisement, broadcast on Arabic television, in which he apologized for alleged abuses at Abu Ghraib prison.

The Times reported Rauf said he believes “Islamic terrorists do not come from another moral universe – that they arise from oppressive societies that he feels Washington had a hand in creating.”

God forbid he should apologize. I mean, if President Bush didn’t apologize, nobody should.

Hold on a minute. What’s that? … President Bush DID apologize for Abu Ghraib? … oh.

… forget what I just said.

Then World Net Daily, having to keep up appearances, “copy-pasted” “comments” from “readers” on “various blogs.”

* Muslims are doing this only to see if they get away with it. It’s the way Islam spreads in every country these days, like a cancer – through incremental totalitarianism. In this case, they’ll quietly open the mosque, then, as they get away with it, they’ll ramp up their outrages until someone finally points it out. At that time, their lawyers, backed by the ACLU and various liberal organizations, will pounce.

* This is not different than allowing the Nazis to establish their headquarters and propaganda office in NYC in 1938. How come people could tell right from wrong then and not now?

* What bonehead allowed this to happen?

* That’s disgusting. That truly is low. I feel bad for the people who lost family members.

* This is outrageous. I just don’t have word.

* This is called “staging” for the KSM trial.

* You’ve got to be kidding me. If this is true, our beloved country is already gone. We no longer have the America I know and love.

* Who wants to bet this place becomes a “tourist attraction” for Muslims? This mosque will become one of Islam’s holiest shrines as it sits upon the site of their greatest modern military victory.

* Good idea. Maybe terrorists will be less likely to bomb this area if there’s a mosque there.

Did you ever watch C-SPAN at 4:00 in the morning? It makes you question the integrity of our Democracy because we have some real idiots in this country. Well, they strike again, having no clue about the world they live in. I mean, let’s say this becomes a tourist attraction. So what? This particular area isn’t exactly thriving after what happened on the day of the terrorist attacks and again with this current recession. The more people it brings in, the more money that will be spent in New York.

One blogger at Patriot Update said we should shoot this plan down because Saudi Arabia wouldn’t allow a Church or Synagogue in their country. Well, DUH! But the last time I checked, we don’t live in Saudi Arabia. We live in a country that embraces religious freedom. And unless that’s changed, I love this country because of that freedom and the many others we have. We are BETTER than Saudi Arabia because of this!

It’s good for New York.

It’s good for Muslims who want a place near other landmarks for the other Abrahamic Faiths (St. Peter’s Catholic Church and the Museum of Jewish Heritage).

It’s good for the community.

It’s good for bringing a greater understanding between the faiths.

The bottom line: IT’S GOOD!

10 Comments »

  1. Comment by Wickle on December 22, 2009

    I want to call WND a smelly armpit of the right-wing web. It might be more accurate to call it a dirty diaper or something. Its deranged birther editor Joe Farrah and its drooling, mouth-breathing readers (including Sean Hannity, who likes to say how much he loves WND) are what give the Right a bad name.

    You’re right, this is fearmongering. A Muslim did something, and it’s in the general vicinity of Ground Zero, so they’ll accuse the Muslims of being really terrible. Never mind that there’s no way to make this bad, and never mind that NOT EVERY MUSLIM IS A TERRORIST.

    WND thrives on hatred. It thrives on fear. It’s kind of a pathetic way to live, really … and hard to see the difference between that and an Islamist philosophy, isn’t it?

  2. Comment by Anita Carol on December 22, 2009

    Kevin,

    Help me understand what you are saying.

    I read you to be in favor of muslims and their being close to their 9-11 jihad.

    Explain what you mean by being in favor of jihads having a home near the 9-11 disaster.

    Are you pro-muslim? Did I miss that facet of you when we met?

    Anita

  3. Comment by Anita Carol on December 22, 2009

    I will add as a question, do you think, Kevin, that an Islamic symbol is also correct at the Flight 93 Memorial? You say that you appreciate and approve that the muslims who killed in 9-11 in NYC are sitting next to their greatest (to date) killing of Americans. You talk as if you enjoy that the killers are celebrating their victory by building a place of worship near`the place where they murdered thousands in the name if Islam.

    Do you like this also?

    See here for some info:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/us/05memorial.html

    Do you think that it is by accident, from all of the shapes available to designers, from all of the lines and curves that are available to artists that they come up with a symbol of Islam over the dead bodies of those killed by muslims?

    Can you imagine your child, your sister, your friend murdered in this attack, and then have their sacrifices covered by a symbol of the very people that murdered them? Same with the muslim building that you are so glad about next to the death that they caused in 9-11 in NYC

    What is up with this?

  4. Comment by kevintracy on December 22, 2009

    Anita,
    Innocent Muslim Americans were among those killed by the terrorists on September 11th. Since 9/11, more Muslims have been killed by acts of terrorism than have Christians and Jews.

    You ask if I am pro-Islam? Personally, I’m a Roman Catholic with a strong fondness for the other Apostolic Churches (the Orthodox). If I was allowed to force people to belong to any religion, everybody would be Orthodox Christians or Catholics. Protestantism, Judaism, and Islam are all on equal footing in my book. I’m particularly fond of the Islamic notion of Dhimi, or “Brothers of the Faith.” In other words, we all worship the same God (the god of Abraham), and therefore we should protect one another.

    If not being anti-Islam makes me pro-Islam, then I suppose by that definition, I am pro-Islam.

  5. Comment by kevintracy on December 22, 2009

    I don’t blame Muslims for 9/11 any more than I blame Jews for the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin or Protestants for the denial of civil rights and liberties to the Irish for centuries.

    As a former intelligence analyst in the Air Force and terrorism analyst for the government, I can tell you undoubtedly that virtually all of the progress we’ve made in the War on Terrorism has come because Muslims are stepping up and cooperating with us. Have you by chance heard of the Iraqi and Afghan armies? Guess what. They’re Muslims and fighting the same terrorists we are!

  6. Comment by LD Jackson on December 22, 2009

    Interesting post, Kevin. As far as WND goes, I have to come down on the same side of this as Wickle. I find it hard to trust much of what they publish.

    Now, let’s move on to the discussion of the Islamic Cultural Center. We have to be careful to make sure we do not group all Muslims in with those who committed the terrible acts that took place on 9/11. To do so is to make a grave mistake. At the same time, we need to be careful to make sure those Muslims who are prone to such acts are dealt with summarily and quickly, preferably before they advance to actually committing them.

    It’s a very fine line we have to walk.

  7. Comment by briand on December 22, 2009

    An excellent post. I have had several Islamic friends and they desire peace and love every bit as much as I do. We were not attacked just because we are so rich, pretty and successful as Rush Limbaugh said. Maybe it goes a little deeper than that.

  8. Comment by Travis Gearhart on December 25, 2009

    Kevin, I actually work with a muslim fellow who gave me some contact info, perhaps you would be interested in sitting in on the phone interview, asking a few questions and getting involved in the discussions? I’ll call ya soon. Merry Christmas!

  9. Comment by flyUSMC on January 2, 2010

    Kevin,
    Absolutely appalling! How was it possible for the USS Cole bombing, the 9/11 attacks, the shooting of Pvt. William A. Long, the Fort Hood massacre, or the attempted bombing of flight 253 to occur? It was because of naive, peace loving, bleeding heart liberal clowns like you. The enemy has never been closer and more dangerous than ever before and you want to let them use the location of the most devastating terrorist attack on U.S. soil, in the history of this nation, as a place of prayer. Oh sure, they just want a place to pray. And yes it will be a really pretty building to look at. I’m sure they wouldn’t use there new trophy to recruit more radicals. Nooooooo, they are too peace loving for that! I can’t believe what I’m hearing. Here’s one more thing we can learn from the Europeans (something not to do). They are knee deep in radical Islam because of their years of appeasement. Remember the riots in France a few years ago?! And “…more Muslims have been killed by acts of terrorism than have Christians and Jews.” That is somehow supposed to make us feel better? What planet are you from? Read the Koran! Their radical side comes from the words in their “bible” not from some nut job that perverts those words. Tell you what, you push your head further in the sand, and I’ll blow this real threat up to the proportion it should be. In the end of the day my life, and the lives of family members is more important than welcoming more jihadist into my backyard.

  10. Comment by Kevin Tracy on January 2, 2010

    Fly,
    I’ve read the Qur’an and it’s no more violent than the Old Testament. It’s a very dated textbook on how to live harmoniously in a poor, desert community in the 7th century. What you’re advocating will eventually come down to a position that we ought to nuke all the world’s Muslims. After all, if they are our enemies and they will ALL stop at nothing to kill Americans, then the only thing to do is to kill them all before they can kill all of us. So I’m really left wondering what planet you are from, because your ideology makes you and people like you a lot more bloodthirsty than the Muslims I’ve served with in the Air Force, have met since then, and continue to have the privilege of calling friends.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Facebook YouTube My Space Flickr Twitter Zannel Digg KTracy.com RSS Feed

Powered by WordPress